By Lindsey Cole
The Oshawa Express
To some councillors any tax increase is a bad increase.
But to the majority of council, the fact city staff was able to get an increase down to 0.9 per cent is a feat in itself.
This means, based on a $250,000 home in the city, the taxpayer will be adding $13.34 to their property tax bill.
On Friday, after hours of discussion, council passed the budget with only Councillors John Neal and Robert Lutczyk voting against it.
Originally, city staff projected a 1.9 per cent tax increase or a $28 increase, but after re-examining some areas, staff was able to get that number down, says City Manager Bob Duignan.
But it does mean a stringent budget with little wiggle room.
“It’s going to require strict adherence. We must emphasize the city faces other challenges,” says Duignan, adding the low increase is due to reduced contributions to the city’s reserve funds which essentially helps fund certain projects for the city.
“Reduced reserve fund contributions, I stress, should only be temporary. Our reserve funds are certainly underfunded,” he explains.
In all, the city had a total of more than $2.7 million in savings in its core sectors, with reductions to various areas. This meant modifying the corporate capital envelope. To date, the city has received funding for eight projects totalling $33 million with $20 million being provided by the federal and provincial stimulus programs.
Through these projects, as well as through deferring other projects that require tax contributions, the city was able to save $600,000.
Salary and wage gapping – extending the time frame between hiring, giving out exit packages to nine staff members through a staff rationalization program, various audits and energy savings also contributed to large reductions in the budget.
According to a staff report, during council’s term the budget increases were amongst the lowest in the Greater Toronto Area with a savings of $20 million overall.
However, other challenges may plague the city in 2010, the city manager warns, including increased labour costs, funding for upgrades or replacements of operations and environmental service depots, ice rationalization, and several major infrastructure projects like the GO Transit extension and the Hwy. 407 expansion.
“We’ve been creative but responsible,” Duignan told council, adding another reason for only a 0.9 per cent increase was because of winter maintenance savings of $276,000 to date in 2010.
The winter simply hasn’t been that bad, he says.
“We budget on the basis of a three to five year period. I mentioned to you a lot of challenges and if they are not managed there will be an increase,” he says.
Before the budget was passed some residents and councillors did have their say.
Areas of concern revolved around accountability and transparency and a zero per cent increase.
“I don’t believe my input will find its way into the budget,” says Tamara Morahan, adding she was hoping the document would be more open to the public.
For Bruce Wood the educational policy, property taxes and the Cullen Miniatures (which were not included in the budget) were areas that needed to be addressed. |