To replace the costly inquiry,
perhaps we could set up a new
definition or model of Grand
Jury, staffed with people from the
profession focused upon, skilled
investigators and interrogators,
plus qualified lay persons, all
chosen by lot.
That grand jury would focus
on obtaining, in secret session,
what was wrong with the system
of checks and balances that
allowed crime, if there was one,
to occur.
Such a Grand Jury may not
have a need for lawyers, except as
observers.
The new model Grand Jury
would have only two avenues of
redress, one for recovery of material
assets and one avenue of retribution,
if a person were proven
to have lied.
I, as a voter, am much more
interested in assuring that the system
be fixed than obtaining
vengeance against a person,
regardless of how satisfying that
would be.
Ed Goertzen
Oshawa |